Open Access Journal Article

Follow Suit: Imitative governance, resource inclination, and regional innovation efficiency

by Shutter Zor a,* ,  Jingru Chen b ,  Jietie Ailimujiang c  and  Fayao Wang d
a
School of Accountancy, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan, China
b
School of Economics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
c
Moscow School of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
d
Institute for Advanced Studies, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
REA  2023 2(1):7; https://doi.org/10.58567/rea02010002
Received: 30 January 2023 / Accepted: 30 March 2023 / Published Online: 23 April 2023
View Full-Text
Download PDF

Abstract

Influenced by traditional notions of solidarity, when a province’s planning can be highly aligned with that of the central government, the province is perceived to be more collective and thus able to receive financial or resource favors from the central government. This consistency, as is often the case, reflected in doing the same thing as the central government. This situation may lead governors to ignore local economic performance and thus reduce regional innovation efficiency, as in the case of China’s Great Leap Forward. Likewise, it is possible to get better resources (energy or capital) by demonstrating managerial submissiveness, thus improving the regional innovation efficiency. Therefore, to verify the relationship between imitative governance and regional innovation efficiency, we collected relevant data from 31 major provincial administrative units in China, calculated the degree of imitative governance between provincial government work reports and central government work reports through text similarity, as well as utilized the SBM-DEA model to evaluate regional innovation efficiency. Meanwhile, we provide a new explanation of the phenomenon from the perspective of resource inclination. Finally, the empirical results show that imitative governance promotes local innovation efficiency and is moderated by resource inclination.

Keywords: Imitative governance; Text similarity; Resource inclination; SBM-DEA; Innovation efficiency;
Copyright: © 2023 by Zor, Chen, Ailimujiang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Show Figures

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Zor, S.; Chen, J.; Ailimujiang, J.; Wang, F. Follow Suit: Imitative governance, resource inclination, and regional innovation efficiency. Review of Economic Assessment, 2023, 2, 7. https://doi.org/10.58567/rea02010002
AMA Style
Zor S, Chen J, Ailimujiang J, Wang F. Follow Suit: Imitative governance, resource inclination, and regional innovation efficiency. Review of Economic Assessment; 2023, 2(1):7. https://doi.org/10.58567/rea02010002
Chicago/Turabian Style
Zor, Shutter; Chen, Jingru; Ailimujiang, Jietie; Wang, Fayao 2023. "Follow Suit: Imitative governance, resource inclination, and regional innovation efficiency" Review of Economic Assessment 2, no.1:7. https://doi.org/10.58567/rea02010002
APA style
Zor, S., Chen, J., Ailimujiang, J., & Wang, F. (2023). Follow Suit: Imitative governance, resource inclination, and regional innovation efficiency. Review of Economic Assessment, 2(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.58567/rea02010002

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Ataay, A. (2020). CEO outsiderness and firm performance in an emerging economy: The moderating role of managerial discretion. J. Manag. Organ. 26(5), 798-814. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.36
  2. Barney, J.B., Ketchen, D.J., Wright, M. (2011). The Future of Resource-Based Theory: Revitalization or Decline? J. Manag. 37(5), 1299-1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310391805
  3. Bel, R., Smirnov, V., Wait, A. (2018). Managing change: Communication, managerial style and change in organizations. Econ. Model. 69, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.09.001
  4. Chang, Y.T., Zhang, N., Danao, D., Zhang, N. (2013). Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach. Energy Policy 58, 277-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.011
  5. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6), 429-444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  6. Chen, F., Ding, J., Li, M., & Wang, B. (2021). From self‐entertainment to being appreciated: how does social media transfer talent to business?. Accounting & Finance, 61(5), 6113-6146. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12859
  7. Chen, K.H., Kou, M.T., Fu, X.L. (2018). Evaluation of multi-period regional R&D efficiency: An application of dynamic DEA to China's regional R&D systems. Omega-Int. J. Manage. Sci. 74, 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.01.010
  8. Chen, T.J., Chen, H.M., Ku, Y.H. (2012). Resource dependency and parent-subsidiary capability transfers. J. World Bus. 47(2), 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2011.04.013
  9. Cohen, L., Malloy, C., Nguyen, Q. (2020). Lazy Prices. J. Financ. 75(3), 1371-1415. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12885
  10. Cong, D., Liang, L.L., Jing, S.X., Han, Y.M., Geng, Z.Q., Chu, C. (2021). Energy supply efficiency evaluation of integrated energy systems using novel SBM-DEA integrating Monte Carlo. Energy 231, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120834
  11. Deng, G.Y., Li, L., Song, Y.N. (2016). Provincial water use efficiency measurement and factor analysis in China: Based on SBM-DEA model. Ecol. Indic. 69, 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.052
  12. Ding, J., Liu, B., & Shao, X. (2022). Spatial effects of industrial synergistic agglomeration and regional green development efficiency: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 112, 106156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106156
  13. Du, K.R., Cheng, Y.Y., Yao, X. (2021). Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: The road to the green transformation of Chinese cities. Energy Econ. 98, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105247
  14. Giachetti, C., Li Pira, S. (2022). Catching up with the market leader: Does it pay to rapidly imitate its innovations? Res. Policy 51(5), 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104505
  15. Gore, L.L.P. (2019). The Communist Party-Dominated Governance Model of China: Legitimacy, Accountability, and Meritocracy. Polity 51(1), 161-194. https://doi.org/10.1086/700615
  16. Hu, J. (2023). Synergistic effect of pollution reduction and carbon emission mitigation in the digital economy. Journal of Environmental Management, 337, 117755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117755
  17. Hu, J., Zhang, H., & Irfan, M. (2023). How does digital infrastructure construction affect low-carbon development? A multidimensional interpretation of evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 396, 136467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136467
  18. Ji, Y.H., Lei, Y.L., Li, L., Zhang, A., Wu, S.M., Li, Q. (2021). Evaluation of the implementation effects and the influencing factors of resource tax in China. Resour. Policy 72, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102126
  19. Kim, D.H., Wu, Y.C., Lin, S.C. (2018). Heterogeneity in the effects of government size and governance on economic growth. Econ. Model. 68, 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.07.014
  20. Kozlenkova, I.V., Samaha, S.A., Palmatier, R.W. (2014). Resource-based theory in marketing. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 42(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-013-0336-7
  21. Li, Z., Li, Y.B., Shao, S.S. (2019). Analysis of Influencing Factors and Trend Forecast of Carbon Emission from Energy Consumption in China Based on Expanded STIRPAT Model. Energies 12(16), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12163054
  22. Lin, X.Y., Zhu, X.P., Han, Y.M., Geng, Z.Q., Liu, L. (2020). Economy and carbon dioxide emissions effects of energy structures in the world: Evidence based on SBM-DEA model. Sci. Total Environ. 729, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138947
  23. Liu, B., Ju, T., Bai, M., Yu, C.F. (2021). Imitative innovation and financial distress risk: The moderating role of executive foreign experience. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 71, 526-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.09.021
  24. Maiti, M., Krakovich, V., Shams, S.M.R., Vukovic, D.B. (2020). Resource-based model for small innovative enterprises. Manag. Decis. 58(8), 1525-1541. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-06-2019-0725
  25. Marquis, C., Qiao, K.Y. (2020). Waking from Mao's Dream: Communist Ideological Imprinting and the Internationalization of Entrepreneurial Ventures in China. Adm. Sci. Q. 65(3), 795-830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218792837
  26. Mol, M.J., Kotabe, M. (2011). Overcoming Inertia: Drivers of the Outsourcing Process. Long Range Plan. 44(3), 160-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.12.002
  27. Ouyang, X.L., Li, Q., Du, K.R. (2020). How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data. Energy Policy 139, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111310
  28. Ployhart, R.E. (2021). Resources for What? Understanding Performance in the Resource-Based View and Strategic Human Capital Resource Literatures. J. Manag. 47(7), 1771-1786. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211003137
  29. Shen, W.T., Yang, C., Huang, B.Y. (2022). Impact of Managerial Discretion "Stranglehold" on Enterprises Investment Efficiency: Based on Heterogeneous Stochastic Frontier Model. Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade 58(13), 3711-3725. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2022.2068410
  30. Shi, J.M., Katehakis, M.N., Melamed, B. (2013). Martingale methods for pricing inventory penalties under continuous replenishment and compound renewal demands. Ann. Oper. Res. 208(1), 593-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1130-5
  31. Shih, V., Adolph, C., Liu, M.X. (2012). Getting Ahead in the Communist Party: Explaining the Advancement of Central Committee Members in China. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 106(1), 166-187. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055411000566
  32. Shuai, S., Fan, Z. (2020). Modeling the role of environmental regulations in regional green economy efficiency of China: Empirical evidence from super efficiency DEA-Tobit model. J. Environ. Manage. 261, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110227
  33. Wang, D.P., Du, K.R., Zhang, N. (2022). Measuring technical efficiency and total factor productivity change with undesirable outputs in Stata. Stata J. 22(1), 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x221083886
  34. Wang, J.X., Lin, J.T., Feng, K.S., Liu, P., Du, M.X., Ni, R.J., Chen, L.L., Kong, H., Weng, H.J., Liu, M.Y., Baiocchi, G., Zhao, Y., Mi, Z.F., Cao, J., Hubacek, K. (2019). Environmental taxation and regional inequality in China. Sci. Bull. 64(22), 1691-1699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2019.09.017
  35. Wang, L. (2023). Political cycle and effective corporate tax rate: evidence from China. Applied Economics, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2174937
  36. Wu, J.D., Li, N., Shi, P.J. (2014). Benchmark wealth capital stock estimations across China's 344 prefectures: 1978 to 2012. China Econ. Rev. 31, 288-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2014.10.008
  37. Zhang, J., Du, Z.L., Fu, L.Q., Han, Y.M., Zheng, W., Yu, F.H., Chen, H.M., Feng, L., Li, Y.Q., Ping, W.Y. (2021). Novel anaerobic digestion and carbon dioxide emissions efficiency analysis of food waste treatment based on SBM-DEA model. J. Clean Prod. 328, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129591
  38. Zor, S. (2023). Conservation or revolution? The sustainable transition of textile and apparel firms under the environmental regulation: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 135339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135339