Open Access Essay

Testing the Convergence Hypothesis in Primary Energy Consumption in Turkey: The Case of High-Income Countries

by Taleh Mammadov a,*
a
Department of Economics, Kutahya Dumlupınar University, Kutahya, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 December 2024 / Accepted: 25 March 2025 / Published Online: 14 April 2025

Abstract

This study investigates whether Turkey's per capita primary energy consumption converges to that of high-income countries using linear unit root tests over the period 1965-2023. The analysis applies a variety of methods, including the Lee and Strazicich (2003) test, Narayan and Popp (2010) test, Lumsdaine and Papell (1997) test, and the conventional ADF test. According to the results of the Lee and Strazicich test, the energy convergence series is stationary at the 1% significance level in Model AA and at the 10% significance level in Model CC. These findings suggest that Turkey may exhibit signs of energy consumption convergence with high-income countries. However, the results of other methods, including Narayan and Popp (2010), Lumsdaine and Papell (1997), and the ADF test, reveal that the series has a unit root, indicating non-stationarity. This inconsistency highlights a lack of definitive evidence supporting energy consumption convergence. The divergence in findings among different methodologies underscores the need for more robust and comprehensive analyses to thoroughly evaluate the energy convergence hypothesis. Addressing this issue could contribute to a better understanding of Turkey's energy consumption dynamics relative to high-income countries.


Copyright: © 2025 by Mammadov. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Cite This Paper
APA Style
Mammadov, T. (2025). Testing the Convergence Hypothesis in Primary Energy Consumption in Turkey: The Case of High-Income Countries. Journal of Economic Statistics, 3(1), 19. doi:10.58567/jes03010002
ACS Style
Mammadov, T. Testing the Convergence Hypothesis in Primary Energy Consumption in Turkey: The Case of High-Income Countries. Journal of Economic Statistics, 2025, 3, 19. doi:10.58567/jes03010002
AMA Style
Mammadov T. Testing the Convergence Hypothesis in Primary Energy Consumption in Turkey: The Case of High-Income Countries. Journal of Economic Statistics; 2025, 3(1):19. doi:10.58567/jes03010002
Chicago/Turabian Style
Mammadov, Taleh 2025. "Testing the Convergence Hypothesis in Primary Energy Consumption in Turkey: The Case of High-Income Countries" Journal of Economic Statistics 3, no.1:19. doi:10.58567/jes03010002

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Mammadov, T. Testing the Convergence Hypothesis in Primary Energy Consumption in Turkey: The Case of High-Income Countries. Journal of Economic Statistics, 2025, 3, 19. doi:10.58567/jes03010002
AMA Style
Mammadov T. Testing the Convergence Hypothesis in Primary Energy Consumption in Turkey: The Case of High-Income Countries. Journal of Economic Statistics; 2025, 3(1):19. doi:10.58567/jes03010002
Chicago/Turabian Style
Mammadov, Taleh 2025. "Testing the Convergence Hypothesis in Primary Energy Consumption in Turkey: The Case of High-Income Countries" Journal of Economic Statistics 3, no.1:19. doi:10.58567/jes03010002
APA style
Mammadov, T. (2025). Testing the Convergence Hypothesis in Primary Energy Consumption in Turkey: The Case of High-Income Countries. Journal of Economic Statistics, 3(1), 19. doi:10.58567/jes03010002

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Akarsu, G., and Berke, B. (2020). Convergence of Electricity Consumption in Turkey: Spatial Panel Data Analysis. Panoeconomicus, 67(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN161129007A
  2. Akram, V., Rath, B. N., and Sahoo, P. K. (2020). Stochastic Conditional Convergence in Per Capita Energy Consumption in India. Economic Analysis and Policy 65, 224-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.01.006
  3. Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind. The Journal of Economic History, 46(2), 385–406. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2122171
  4. Dickey, D. A., and Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of The Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with A Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74(366a), 427-431. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286348
  5. Esenyel, N. M., (2017). Türkiye’de Enerji Yakınsama Hipotezinin Sınanması: Yapısal Kırılmalı Birim Kök Analizi. Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(3), 42-52.
  6. Eyüboğlu, K., and Eyüboğlu, S. (2020). Borsa İstanbul Sektör Endekslerinin Etkinliğinin Fourier Birim Kök Testleri İle Analizi. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (29), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.648896
  7. Fallahi, F., and Voia, M. C. (2015). Convergence and Persistence in Per Capita Energy Use Among OECD Countries: Revisited Using Confidence Intervals. Energy Economics, 52(Part A), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.10.004
  8. Güriş, B., Yaşgül, Y. S., and Tıraşoğlu, M. (2018). E7 Ülkelerinde Satınalma Gücü Paritesinin Geçerliliğinin Doğrusal ve Doğrusal Olmayan Birim Kök Testleri ile Analizi. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2) (ICEFM 2017 Özel Sayısı / Special Issue of ICEFM 2017), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.387999
  9. Harvey, D. I., and Leybourne, S. J. (2007). Testing for Time Series Linearity. The Econometrics Journal, 10(1), 149–165. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23116683
  10. Harvey, D., Leybourne, S. J., and Xiao, B. (2008). A Powerful Test for Linearity When the Order of Integration is Unknown. Studies Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 12(3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1582
  11. Hasanov, M., and Telatar, E. (2011). A Re-examination of Stationarity of Energy Consumption: Evidence From New Unit Root Tests. Energy Policy, 39(12), 7726-7738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.017
  12. Islam, N. (2003). What have We Learnt from the Convergence Debate?. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(3), 309–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00197
  13. Karademir, C., Felek, Ş., and Ceylan R. (2023). G20 Ülkeleri Arasında Kişi Başı Enerji Tüketiminde Yakınsama Hipotezi Geçerli mi? Nahar-Inder Testi’nden Bulgular. Business and Economics Research Journal, 14(3), 337-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.20409/berj.2023.420
  14. Lee, J., and Strazicich, M. C. (2003). Minimum Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082–1089. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303772815961
  15. Lee, T. H., White, H., and Granger, C. W. J. (1993). Testing for Neglected Nonlinearity in Time Series Models. Journal of Econometrics, 56, 269-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(93)90122-L
  16. Lumsdaine, R. L., and Papell, D. H. (1997). Multiple Trend Breaks and the Unit-Root Hypothesis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(2), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465397556791
  17. Mammadov, T. (2024). Türkiye’de 1978-2022 Dönemi Gibson Paradoksunun Geçerliliği. BİLTÜRK Ekonomi Ve İlişkili Çalışmalar Dergisi, 6(2), 84-102. https://doi.org/10.47103/bilturk.1432099
  18. Maza, A., and Villaverde, J. (2008). The World Per Capita Electricity Consumption Distribution: Signs of Convergence? Energy Policy, 36(11), 4255–4261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.036
  19. McLeod, A. I., and Li W. K. (1983) Diagnostic Checking ARMA Time Series Models Using Squared-Residual Autocorrelations. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 4(4), 269-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.1983.tb00373.x
  20. Meng, M., Payne, J. E., and Lee, J. (2013). Convergence in Per Capita Energy Use Among OECD Countries. Energy Economics, 36, 536–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.11.002
  21. Mike, F., and Kızılkaya, O. (2021). Kişi Başına Enerji Tüketiminin Yakınsaması: OECD Ülkeleri Için Ampirik Bir Analiz. Journal of Yaşar University, 16(61), 298-309. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.811847
  22. Mishra, V., and Smyth, R. (2014). Convergence in Energy Consumption Per Capita Among ASEAN Countries. Energy Policy, 73, 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.006
  23. Mishra, V., and Smyth, R. (2017). Conditional Convergence in Australia’s Energy Consumption at The Sector Level. Energy Economics, 62, 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.07.009
  24. Narayan, P. K., and Popp, S. (2010). A New Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks in Level and Slope at Unknown Time. Journal of Applied Statistics, 37(9), 1425–1438. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760903039883
  25. Narayan, P. K., and Smyth, R. (2007). Are Shocks to Energy Consumption Permanent or Temporary? Evidence from 182 Countries. Energy Policy, 35(1), 333–341
  26. Safdar, M., and Nawaz, A. (2020). Testing the Convergence Hypothesis in Solow Growth Model: A Statistical Evidence from SAARC Economies. Bulletin of Business and Economics, 9(2), 60-73.
  27. Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
  28. Tıraşoğlu, M. (2013). G20 Ülkeleri için Gelir Yakınsama Analizinin Panel Birim Kök Testleri ile İncelenmesi. Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6, 91–106
  29. Tsay, R.S. (1986). Nonlinearity Tests for Time Series. Biometrika, 73(2), 461- 466.
  30. Ceylan, R. (2010). Yakınsama Hipotezi: Teorik Tartışmalar. Sosyoekonomi, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.17233/se.31488
  31. Tüzemen, Ö. B., and Tüzemen, S. (2015). Yakınsama Hipotezi: Balkan Ülkeleri Örneği. Balkan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(7)
  32. Savacı, S., and Karşıyakalı, B. (2016). Ülkeler Arası Gelir Yakınsaması Analizi: AB Ülkeleri ve Türkiye. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 16(33), 237-257
  33. Romero-Ávila, D., and Omay, T. (2022). Convergence of Per Capita Energy Consumption Around the World: New Evidence from Nonlinear Panel Unit Root Tests. Energy Economics, 111, 106062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106062