Open Access Journal Article

The role of business environment optimization on entrepreneurship enhancement

by Nannan Wang a,* orcid Dengfeng Cui a orcid Chuanzhen Geng b orcid  and  Zefan Xia c
a
School of Economics and Management, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
b
Rotman Business School, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Canada
c
LSK business school, The Hong Kong university of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 15 October 2022 / Accepted: 29 November 2022 / Published Online: 19 December 2022

Abstract

Entrepreneurs are important actors in economic activities and creators of social wealth. Excellent entrepreneurs contribute their wisdom to the accumulation of social wealth and the promotion of high-quality economic and social development. The business environment is the main manifestation of the soft power of cities and regional economic development, and a better business environment can effectively attract enterprises and promote their sustainable growth. Using data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2009-2019 as a research sample, the following research conclusions were drawn: (1) A better business environment helps enhance entrepreneurship. (2) A better business environment promotes entrepreneurship by reducing rent-seeking expenses and corporate credit costs. (3) Compared to traditional enterprises, high-tech enterprises are better able to enjoy the benefits brought by business environment optimization and further enhance entrepreneurship. When competition is low, entrepreneurs face lower rent-seeking expenses, which is conducive to stimulating entrepreneurship. The businessenvironment can promote fairness and bring more equal financing opportunities for enterprises, which has a higher impact on entrepreneurship for the group facing higher financing constraints. This study meticulously analyzes the impact ofthebusiness environment on entrepreneurship, providing references for the next steps of optimizing the business environment and enhancing entrepreneurship.


Copyright: © 2022 by Wang, Cui, Geng and Xia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Show Figures

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Wang, N.; Cui, D.; Geng, C.; Xia, Z. The role of business environment optimization on entrepreneurship enhancement. Journal of Economic Analysis, 2022, 1, 13. https://doi.org/10.58567/jea01020005
AMA Style
Wang N, Cui D, Geng C, Xia Z. The role of business environment optimization on entrepreneurship enhancement. Journal of Economic Analysis; 2022, 1(2):13. https://doi.org/10.58567/jea01020005
Chicago/Turabian Style
Wang, Nannan; Cui, Dengfeng; Geng, Chuanzhen; Xia, Zefan 2022. "The role of business environment optimization on entrepreneurship enhancement" Journal of Economic Analysis 1, no.2:13. https://doi.org/10.58567/jea01020005
APA style
Wang, N., Cui, D., Geng, C., & Xia, Z. (2022). The role of business environment optimization on entrepreneurship enhancement. Journal of Economic Analysis, 1(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.58567/jea01020005

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R.W., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120 (2): 701-728. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9269
  2. Akhmetshin, R.M., & Shafigullina, A.V. (2015). Government Regulation of Small and Medium Entrepreneurship under the Influence of Value-Time Benchmarks. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n1s3p151
  3. Anderson, M.R., Banker, R., & Janakiraman, S. (2006). “Cost Behavior and Fundamental Analysis of SG&A Cost” .Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x0702200103
  4. Baumol, W. J. (1993). Entrepreneurship, Management and the Structure of Payoffs, Cambridge, MA: MIT-Pres. https://doi.org/10.2307/2554878
  5. Baker, S.R., Bloom N., & Davis S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4): 1593-1636. https://doi.org/10.3386/w21633
  6. Behr, P., Entzian, A., & Giittler, A. (2011). How do lending relationships affect access to credit and loan conditions in microlending? Journal of Banking& Finance. (8): 2169-2178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.01.005
  7. Bertomeu, J., & Marinovic, I. (2016). A Theory of Hard and Soft Information. The Accounting Review, 91: 1 -20. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51102
  8. Brackea, P., Hilberb, C. A. L., & Silvab, O. (2018). Mortgage debt and entrepreneurship. Journal of Urban Economics, 103: 52-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2017.10.003
  9. Brychko, M., Bilan, Y., Lyeonov, S., & Streimikiene, D. (2022). Do changes in the business environment and sustainable development really matter for enhancing enterprise development? Sustainable Development, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2410
  10. Bu, D., Liao, Y. (2022). Land property rights and rural enterprise growth: Evidence from land titling reform in China. Journal of Development Economics, 157, 102853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102853
  11. Buchanan, J.R., & Tollision, G. (1980). Toward a theory of Rent-seeking Society. College Park: Texas A&M University Press, 359-367. https://doi.org/10.2307/1058683
  12. Chowdhury, F., Audretsch, D.B., & Belitski, M. (2019). Institutions and Entrepreneurship Quality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718780431
  13. Demerjian, P., Lev, B.; & McVay, S. (2012). Quantifying Managerial Ability: A New Measure and Validation Tests. Managerial Science, 58 (7) : 1229-1248. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1266974
  14. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. The Accounting Review, 86: 59-100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005
  15. Dhaliwal, D., Judd, J. S., Serfling, M., & Shaikh, S. (2016). Customer concentration risk and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61 (1): 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.03.005
  16. Diamond, D.W., & Verrecchia, R.E. (1991). Disclosure, Liquidity, and the Cost of Capital. The Journal of Finance, 46: 1325-1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04620.x
  17. Dong, Z., Wei, X., & Zhang, Y. (2016). The allocation of entrepreneurial efforts in a rent-seeking society: evidence from China”. Journal of Comparative Economics, 44 (2): 353-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2015.02.004
  18. Dorfleitner, G., Priberny, C., Schuster, S., Stoiber, J., Weber, M., De Castro, I., Kammler, J. (2016). Description-text Related Soft Information in Peer-to-peer Lending-Evidence from Two Leading European Platforms. Journal of Banking &Finance, 64, 169-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.11.009
  19. Dutta, S., Folta, T. B., & Rodrigues, J. (2020). Does government fund the best entrepreneurial ventures? the case of the small business innovation research program. Academy of Management Discoveries,8(1): 103-138. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2019.0078
  20. Fields, L.P., Fraser, D.R., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2012). Board Quality and the Cost of Debt Capital: The Case of Bank Loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36: 1536-1547. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1590298
  21. Hackler, D., & Mayer, H. (2008). Diversity, entrepreneurship, and the urban environment. Routledge. 3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2008.00396.x
  22. Haidar, J. (2012). The Impact of Business Regulatory reforms on Economic Growth. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 26 (3): 285-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2012.05.004
  23. Hébert R F, & Link A N. (1989). In Search of the Meaning of Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00389915
  24. Jensen, T.L., Leth-Petersen, S.N. Ramana. (2022). Financing constraints, home equity and selection into entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 145 (2):318-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.10.012
  25. Jiang, R., & Fan,W. (2021). Inclusive finance and employment: Can financial development improve peasant's entrepreneurship? Managerial and Decision Economics, (4). https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3407
  26. Kooky, J., & Shin, S., (2004). Financial liberalization and corporate investments: evidence from Korean firm data. Asian Economic Journal, (3): 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8381.2004.00193.x
  27. Lim, D.S.K., Morse, E.A., & Mitchell, R. K. (2010). Institutional environment and entrepreneurial cognitions: A comparative business systems perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory&Practice, 34 (3) : 491-516.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00384.x
  28. Liu, X., & Li, S. (2022). The impact of criminal law regulation-based business environment optimization on entrepreneurial spirit and enterprise development. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.944146
  29. Lucas, P.D.M., Gustavo, H., & Bruno, B.F. (2022). The impact of the institutional environment on entrepreneurial activity: an analysis of developing and developed countries. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 11 (1):1-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/jepp-09-2021-0113
  30. Malik, A., & Froese, F.J. (2022). Corruption as a perverse Innovation: The dark side of digitalization and corruption in international business. Journal of Business Research, 145: 682-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.032
  31. Paunov, C, & Rollo, V. (2016). Has the internet fostered inclusive innovation in the developing world?. World Development, (78): 587-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.029
  32. Pittman J A, & Fortin S, (2004). “Auditor Choice and the Cost of Debt Capital for Newly Public Firms”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, (1), 113-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.06.005
  33. Qin, N., & Kong, D. (2021). Access to Credit and Entrepreneurship: Evidence from China. Economic Development and Cultural Change. https://doi.org/10.1086/714440
  34. Río, F.D. (2021). The impact of rent seeking on social infrastructure and productivity. Review of Development Economics, 25, 1741-1760. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12772
  35. Sendra-Pons, P., Comeig, I., & Mas-Tur, A. (2022). Institutional factors affecting entrepreneurship: A QCA analysis. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28 (3): 100187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100187
  36. Shamshur, A., & Weill L. (2019). Does bank efficiency influence the cost of credit? Journal of Banking & Finance, 105 (AUG.): 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.05.002
  37. Slesman, L., Abubakar, Y. A., & Mitra, J. (2020). International Business Review, 30 (3): 101774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101774
  38. Song, C, Park, K.M., & Kim Y. (2020). Socio-cultural factors explaining technology-based entrepreneurial activity: Direct and indirect role of social security. Technology in Society, 61 (4): 101246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101246
  39. Stiglitz, J. E., &Weiss, A. (1981). Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information. SSRN Electronic Journal. 71: 393-410. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1010965
  40. Wang, X., Fan, G., &Yu, J. (2018). Marketization Index Report of China by Provinces (2018) [M]. Beijing: Social Science Literature Press.
  41. Wen, Z., Zhang, L., & Hou, J. (2006). Mediated moderating variables and moderated mediating variables. Journal of Psychology, (03): 448-452.
  42. Wu, C., & Lin, J. (2022). The Relationship Between Business Environment and Single Champion Enterprise Entrepreneurship. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788053
  43. Xie, Z., Wang, J., & Miao, L. (2021). Big data and emerging market firms' innovation in an open economy: The diversification strategy perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121091
  44. Xu, G., & Yano, G. (2017). How does anticorruption affect corporate innovation? Evidence from recent anticorruption efforts in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45 (3): 498-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.10.001
  45. Yang, X., Huang, Y., & Gao, M. (2022). Can digital financial inclusion promote female entrepreneurship? Evidence and mechanisms. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101800
  46. Yu, Y., & Xu, J.Q. (2020). The Dynamic Rent-Seeking Games with Policymaker Cost and Competition Intensity. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8081370
  47. Zhao, J., & Wang, J. (2020). Regional Differences and Firms' Innovation Self-Choice Behavior: Insights from China. Sustainability, 12(9),3866. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093866
  48. Zhang, S. and Z. Zhang (2022). Evaluation of Doing Business in Chinese Provinces 2022, Peking University Open Research Data Platform.