Open Access Journal Article

Optimizing Labor Allocation based on Multiobjective Decision Making Using Improved Hungarian Algorithm

by Tram B.T Tran a,*  and  Hien Hoang Phuoc Nguyen a
a
Falculty of Management, Ho Chi Minh City University of Law, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
JES  2023 1(3):15; https://doi.org/10.58567/jes01030002
Received: 13 June 2023 / Accepted: 10 November 2023 / Published Online: 13 December 2023
View Full-Text
Download PDF

Abstract

The aim of this study is to solve the problem of labor allocation in cases where the company has fewer employees than the number of existing jobs based on the evaluation of work quality according to multiple objectives. Optimizing labor allocation not only benefits the company by maximizing the use of human resources, but also saves employees' energy. In addition, employees are assigned to tasks that match their skills and qualifications, maximizing their productivity. The research results show that the multi-objective decision-making algorithm based on the Hungarian algorithm is a suitable method to help leaders of companies solve the aforementioned problem text.

Keywords: Human Resource Management; Hungarian algorithm; Multiobjective Decision Making Model; Optimization;
Copyright: © 2023 by Tran and Nguyen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Tran, T. B.; Nguyen, H. H. P. Optimizing Labor Allocation based on Multiobjective Decision Making Using Improved Hungarian Algorithm. Journal of Economic Statistics, 2023, 1, 15. https://doi.org/10.58567/jes01030002
AMA Style
Tran T B, Nguyen H H P. Optimizing Labor Allocation based on Multiobjective Decision Making Using Improved Hungarian Algorithm. Journal of Economic Statistics; 2023, 1(3):15. https://doi.org/10.58567/jes01030002
Chicago/Turabian Style
Tran, Tram B.; Nguyen, Hien H. P. 2023. "Optimizing Labor Allocation based on Multiobjective Decision Making Using Improved Hungarian Algorithm" Journal of Economic Statistics 1, no.3:15. https://doi.org/10.58567/jes01030002
APA style
Tran, T. B., & Nguyen, H. H. P. (2023). Optimizing Labor Allocation based on Multiobjective Decision Making Using Improved Hungarian Algorithm. Journal of Economic Statistics, 1(3), 15. https://doi.org/10.58567/jes01030002

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Armstrong, M. (2009). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice, 11th edition, Kogan Page Limited, London
  2. Astuti, R. & Navi, M. (2018). Designing workload analysis questionnaire to evaluate needs of employees. AIP Conference Proceedings 1931, AIP Publishing, 030027, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5024086
  3. Baeva, S; Komarevska. D; Nedeva, C; Todorov, T. (2009). Optimization of the human resource efficiency in companies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3271621
  4. Baron, A. & Armstrong, M. (1998). Performance Management: The new realities, Gardners Books, London, UK
  5. Brewster, C., Mayrhofer, W. & Farndale, E. (2018). Handbook of Research in Comparative Human Resource Management, 2nd edition, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing
  6. Greshilov, A.A. (2014). Mathematical Methods of Decision-making. Bauman Moscow State Technical University Press, Moscow
  7. Haiyan Tu. (2019). Using data technology to optimize human resource management in colleges and universities. Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research 351. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/mmetss-19.2019.161
  8. Heinrich, C.J. (2002). Outcomes based performance management in the public sector: Implications for government accountability and effectiveness. Public Administration Review 62, 712–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00253
  9. Mammadova, M.G (1997). Decision-making, Based on a Knowledge Database with a Fuzzy Relational Structure, Elm press, Baku. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75408-6
  10. Mathis, R.L., Jackon, J.H. (2014). Human Resource Management, Cengage Learning press
  11. Mikoni, S.V. (2015). The Theory of Decision-making Management, “Lan” Press, Saint Petersburg, Russian
  12. Kofman, A. (1982). Introduction to the fuzzy set theory. Radio and communication press, Moscow
  13. Kuhn, H.W. (1955). The Hungarian Method for the Assignment Problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 2, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68279-0_2
  14. Li, Yi & Linna, Wang (2022). A Genetic Algorithm Model for Human Resource Management Optimization in the Internet Marketing Era, ID:6931386. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6931386
  15. Liu, L. & Yong, S. (2022). Optimization of digital management path for human resource performance evaluation based on multiobjective decision-making mathematical model. Mobile Information Systems, ID:2604761, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2604761
  16. Rashid, K., Louis, J., Swanson, C. (2020). Optimizing Labor Allocation in Modular Construction Factory Using Discrete Event Simulation and Genetic Algorithm. Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Orlando, FL, USA, 2569-2576. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC48552.2020.9383867
  17. Spencer, L.M., Spencer, S.M. (2008). Competence at Work Models for Superior Performance, Wiley India Pvt. Limited
  18. Trakhtenherts, E.A., (2001). Possibilities and implementation of computer systems for decision-making support. Theary and systems management 3, 86-103.
  19. Wang, J; Bai, W; Liu, Y. (2022). Optimization for human resource management strategy of the IoT industry based on AHP. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3514285
  20. Wang, X. & Zhang, Y. (2022). Enterprise human resource optimization algorithm using PSO model in big data and complex environment. Journal of Environmental and Public health, ID:1244660, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1244660
  21. Weiss, T. & Hartle, F. (1997). Reengineering performance management breakthroughs in achieving strategy through people, CRS Press Publication, USA
  22. Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control 8(3), 338-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  23. Zongmin, L. Xuedong, L., Haidong, Y. (2017). Multi-criteria group decision making method for elevator safe evaluation with hesitant fuzzy judments. Appl. Comput. Math. 16(3), 296-312