Open Access Journal Article

Assessing the impact of digitalization on environmental efficiency: Do population factors and institutional factors Matter?

by Xiaoli Hao a, c ,  Yuhong Li b ,  Shufang Wen a, c  and  Lulu Zhang d,*
a
Center for Innovation Management Research, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830047, China
b
School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
c
School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830047, China
d
College of Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
JIE  2024 2(1):25; https://doi.org/10.58567/jie02010004
Received: 20 February 2024 / Accepted: 3 April 2024 / Published Online: 7 May 2024
View Full-Text
Download PDF

Abstract

The digital transformation provides an opportunity for the development of a green and low-carbon economy. This study used panel data collected from 30 Chinese provinces between 2011 and 2018, and assessed the impact of digitization (Dig) on environmental efficiency (EE). Quantile regression is employed to scrutinize the evolution of the marginal effect. From the perspectives of population and institutional factors, this study empirically investigates nonlinear relationships and potential mechanisms using Hansen threshold and mediation models. The findings reveal several key insights. Overall, levels of digitization and environmental efficiency (EE) are increasing with regional dispersion expansion, indicating a “polarization” characteristic. The impact of digitization on EE exhibits noticeable stage and regional heterogeneity. Analysis of population factors reveals that population structure, population size, and human capital trigger a sharp “marginal increase” of positive effects with single thresholds of 0.8155, 7.2284, and 11.0497, respectively. Analysis of institutional factors highlights the significance of fiscal policy quality (tax proportion), education expenditure, and tax system structure as important intermediaries. Finally, this paper presents corresponding policy implications.

Keywords: Digitalization; environmental efficiency; population factor; institutional factor;
Copyright: © 2024 by Hao, Li, Wen and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Show Figures

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Hao, X.; Li, Y.; Wen, S.; Zhang, L. Assessing the impact of digitalization on environmental efficiency: Do population factors and institutional factors Matter?. Journal of Information Economics, 2024, 2, 25. https://doi.org/10.58567/jie02010004
AMA Style
Hao X, Li Y, Wen S, Zhang L. Assessing the impact of digitalization on environmental efficiency: Do population factors and institutional factors Matter?. Journal of Information Economics; 2024, 2(1):25. https://doi.org/10.58567/jie02010004
Chicago/Turabian Style
Hao, Xiaoli; Li, Yuhong; Wen, Shufang; Zhang, Lulu 2024. "Assessing the impact of digitalization on environmental efficiency: Do population factors and institutional factors Matter?" Journal of Information Economics 2, no.1:25. https://doi.org/10.58567/jie02010004
APA style
Hao, X., Li, Y., Wen, S., & Zhang, L. (2024). Assessing the impact of digitalization on environmental efficiency: Do population factors and institutional factors Matter?. Journal of Information Economics, 2(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.58567/jie02010004

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Abd Hakim, T. (2020). Direct versus indirect taxes: Impact on economic growth and total tax revenue. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(2), 146-153. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n2p146
  2. Alpha Bernard Bangura. (2020). Tax Revenue and Economic Growth of Sierra Leone. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, pp. 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2020/v14i330193
  3. Arnaut, J., & Lidman, J. (2021). Environmental sustainability and economic growth in Greenland: testing the environmental Kuznets curve. Sustainability, 13(3), 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031228
  4. Arrow, K. J. (1971). The economic implications of learning by doing. In Readings in the Theory of Growth (pp. 131-149). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  5. Bai, J., Zhang, Y. & Bian, Y. (2022). Does Innovation-driven Policy Increase Entrepreneurial Activity in Cities——Evidence from the National Innovative City Pilot Policy. China Industrial Economics, (06),63-80.
  6. Bai, P. & Zhang, Y. (2021). Digital Economy, Declining Demographic Dividends and the Rights and Interests of Low- and Medium-skilled Labor. Economic Research Journal, (05),91-108.
  7. Bi, G. B., Song, W., Zhou, P., & Liang, L. (2014). Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China's thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model. Energy Policy, 66, 537-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.056
  8. Bian, Y., & Yang, F. (2010). Resource and environment efficiency analysis of provinces in China: a DEA approach based on Shannon's entropy. Energy Policy, 38(4), 1909-1917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.071
  9. Boserup, M. (1980). Are there really depletable resources?. In Economic Growth and Resources (pp. 49-63). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  10. Bressanelli, G. , Adrodegari, F. , Perona, M. , & Saccani, N. . (2018). Exploring how usage-focused business models enable circular economy through digital technologies. Sustainability, 10(3), 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030639
  11. Briglauer, W., Dürr, N., & Gugler, K. (2021). A retrospective study on the regional benefits and spillover effects of high-speed broadband networks: Evidence from German counties. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 74, 102677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2020.102677
  12. Briglauer, W., Stocker, V., & Whalley, J. (2020). Public policy targets in EU broadband markets: The role of technological neutrality. Telecommunications Policy, 44(5), 101908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101908
  13. Chen, Y. (2020). Improving market performance in the digital economy. China Economic Review, 62, 101482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101482
  14. Chen, Y., Lee, C. C., & Chen, M. (2022). Ecological footprint, human capital, and urbanization. Energy & Environment, 33(3), 487-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X211008610
  15. Chen, Y., Zhu, Z., & Yu, X. (2020). How urbanization affects energy-environment efficiency: evidence from China. The Singapore Economic Review, 65(06), 1401-1422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217590820500447
  16. Dasgupta, P. (1982). The control of resources. Harvard University Press.
  17. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. K., & Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. The review of economics and statistics, 90-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928055
  18. Forster, S. P., & Stefan, S. (2014). Tax revenue accruing from the commercialization of research findings as an indicator for economic benefits of government financed research. Research Evaluation, 23(3), 233-248. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu013
  19. Galeotti, M., Lanza, A., & Pauli, F. (2006). Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A robustness exercise. Ecological economics, 57(1), 152-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.031
  20. Gideon Mukui., Joseph Onjala. & Japheth Awiti. (2020). Effect of Tax and Debt Financed Government Expenditure on Economic Growth in Kenya. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, pp. 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/jemt/2020/v26i130215
  21. Glover, L., & Siu, N. (2000). The human resource barriers to managing quality in China. International journal of human resource management, 11(5), 867-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/095851900422320
  22. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The quarterly journal of economics, 110(2), 353-377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
  23. Hansen B. E. (1999). Threshold Effects in Non-dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing and Inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93(2), 345-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00025-1
  24. Hao, X., & Deng, F. (2019). The marginal and double threshold effects of regional innovation on energy consumption structure: Evidence from resource-based regions in China. Energy Policy, 131, 144-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.034
  25. Huang, M. & Ye, Q. (2017). The Marxist green development concept and green development in contemporary China: Comment on incompatibility theory between environment and development. Economic Research Journal, 52(6), 17-30.
  26. Hunjra, A. I., Tayachi, T., Chani, M. I., Verhoeven, P., & Mehmood, A. (2020). The moderating effect of institutional quality on the financial development and environmental quality nexus. Sustainability, 12(9), 3805. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093805
  27. Jayanthakumaran, K., Verma, R., & Liu, Y. (2012). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: a comparative analysis of China and India. Energy Policy, 42(Mar.), p.450-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.010
  28. Jiang, T. (2022). Mediating Effects and Moderating Effects in Causal Inference. China Industrial Economics.05,100-120
  29. Kang, M., & Lee, M. J. (2017). Absorptive capacity, knowledge sharing, and innovative behaviour of R&D employees. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(2), 219-232.
  30. Li, C., Wan, J., Xu, Z., & Lin, T. (2021). Impacts of green innovation, institutional constraints and their interactions on high-quality economic development across China. Sustainability, 13(9), 5277. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095277
  31. Li, H. & Zou, Qin. .(2018). Environmental Regulations, Resource Endowments and Urban Industry Transformation: Comparative Analysis of Resource-based and Non-resource-based Cities. Economic Research Journal, (11),182-198. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310475
  32. Li, Z. D. . (2003). An econometric study on China's economy, energy and environment to the year 2030. Energy Policy, 31(11), 1137-1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00219-7
  33. Liu, J., Xue, Y., Mao, Z., Irfan, M., & Wu, H. (2022). How to improve total factor energy efficiency under climate change: does export sophistication matter?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24175-2
  34. Long, R., Li, H., Wu, M., & Li, W. (2021). Dynamic evaluation of the green development level of China's coal-resource-based cities using the topsis method. Resources Policy, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102415
  35. Ma, D., & Zhu, Q. (2022). Innovation in emerging economies: Research on the digital economy driving high-quality green development. Journal of Business Research, 145, 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.041
  36. Ma, L. M., & Huang, C. L. (2022). Financial Drivers and Renewable Energy Development—A Dynamic Evolution Analysis Based on Multinational Data. China Ind. Econ, 4, 118-136.
  37. Ma, Q., Mentel, G., Zhao, X., Salahodjaev, R., & Kuldasheva, Z. (2022). Natural resources tax volatility and economic performance: evaluating the role of digital economy. Resources Policy, 75(1), 102510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102510
  38. Ma, X., Li, Q., & Han, Y. (2015). The impact of population on environmental pollution in China: based on provincial static and dynamic panel data model. Ecological Economy, 31(10), 138-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2095-y
  39. Morikawa, M. (2012). Population density and efficiency in energy consumption: an empirical analysis of service establishment. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.01.004
  40. Nchofoung, T. N., & Asongu, S. A. (2022). ICT for sustainable development: Global comparative evidence of globalisation thresholds. Telecommunications Policy, 46(5), 102296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102296
  41. Pei, C. H., Ni, J. F., & Li, Y. (2018). Approach digital economy from the perspective of political economics. Financ. Trade Econ, 39, 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2019-080102
  42. Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare Macmillan and Co. London, United Kingdom.
  43. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
  44. Powell, D. (2022). Quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects. Empirical Economics, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00181-022-02216-6
  45. Junyan, Q. I., & Yida, R. E. N. (2022). Digital Economy Development, Institutional Quality and Upstreamness of Global Value Chains. Frontiers of Economics in China, 17(1).
  46. Ren, S., Hao, Y., Xu, L., Wu, H., & Ba, N. (2021). Digitalization and energy: How does internet development affect China's energy consumption?. Energy Economics, 98, 105220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105220
  47. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of political economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.
  48. Schumpeter, J. A. (1982). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (1912/1934). Transaction Publishers.–1982.–January, 1, 244.
  49. Selden T M, Song D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions?. Journal of Environmental Economics and management, 27(2): 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1006/JEEM.1994.1031
  50. Shafik, N. (1994). Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxford economic papers, 757-773. https://doi.org/10.1093/OEP%2F46.SUPPLEMENT_1.757
  51. Shao, S., & Yang, L. (2014). Natural resource dependence, human capital accumulation, and economic growth: A combined explanation for the resource curse and the resource blessing. Energy Policy, 74, 632-642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.07.007
  52. Shen, N. (2012). Environmental efficiency, industrial heterogeneity and intensity of optimal regulation—nonlinear test based on industrial panel-data. China Industrial Economics, 3, 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221105478
  53. Shi, D., Ding, H., Wei, P., & Liu, J. (2018). Can smart city construction reduce environmental pollution. China Ind. Econ, 6, 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102809
  54. Song, M., Xie, Q., & Shen, Z. (2021). Impact of green credit on high-efficiency utilization of energy in China considering environmental constraints. Energy Policy, 153, 112267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112267
  55. Sun, C. Z., Tong, Y. L., & Liu, W. X. (2017). Measurement of green development level and its dynamic evolution rule in China. Econ. Geogr, 37, 15-22.
  56. Tachega, M. A., Yao, X., Liu, Y., Ahmed, D., Ackaah, W., Gabir, M., & Gyimah, J. (2021). Income heterogeneity and the environmental Kuznets curve turning points: Evidence from Africa. Sustainability, 13(10), 5634. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105634
  57. Tambunan, M. R., & Rosdiana, H. (2020). Indonesia tax authority measure on facing the challenge in taxing digital economy. The International Technology Management Review, 9(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.2991/itmr.k.200203.001
  58. Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research policy, 47(8), 1367-1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015
  59. Tina, R. , Mattias, H. , Anna, K. , & Anna, V. . (2018). Digitalization and environmental aims in municipalities. Sustainability, 10(4), 1278. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041278
  60. Turina, A. (2020). The progressive policy shift in the debate on the international tax challenges of the digital economy: A “pretext” for overhaul of the international tax regime?. Computer Law & Security Review, 36, 105382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105382
  61. Wang, J., Wang, W., Ran, Q., Irfan, M., Ren, S., Yang, X., ... & Ahmad, M. (2022). Analysis of the mechanism of the impact of internet development on green economic growth: evidence from 269 prefecture cities in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-15.
  62. Wang, T., & Zatzick, C. D. (2019). Human capital acquisition and organizational innovation: A temporal perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0114
  63. Wu, C. & Sun, X. (2021). Research on Theoretical Logic and Strategic Orientation the Development of Digital Economy Driven by Blockchain Technology. International Journal of Education and Management, 6(3),1-25
  64. Wu, C. (2017). Human capital, life expectancy, and the environment. Journal of international trade & economic development, 26(7-8), 885-906. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2017.1314543
  65. Wu, H., Hao, Y., & Ren, S. (2020). How do environmental regulation and environmental decentralization affect green total factor energy efficiency: evidence from China. Energy Economics, 91, 104880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104880
  66. Wu, H., Hao, Y., & Weng, J. H.. (2019). How does energy consumption affect China's urbanization? new evidence from dynamic threshold panel models. Energy Policy, 127, 24-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.057
  67. Wu, H., Hao, Y., Ren, S., Yang, X., & Xie, G. (2021). Does internet development improve green total factor energy efficiency? Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 153, 112247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112247
  68. Xiang, X., Yang, G., & Sun, H. (2022). The impact of the digital economy on low-carbon, inclusive growth: Promoting or restraining. Sustainability, 14(12), 7187. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127187
  69. Xu, X., & Zhang, M. (2020). Research on the scale measurement of China’s digital economy—Based on the perspective of international comparison. China Industrial Economics 5, 23-41.
  70. Xue, Y. (2022). Evaluation analysis on industrial green total factor productivity and energy transition policy in resource-based region. Energy & Environment, 33(3), 419-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X211005428
  71. Yan, X., Cheng, C. C., Yi, G. F., & Bai, J. C. (2019). Economic threshold effect of urbanization on energy consumption: Take the Yangtze River Economic Zone as an example. Economic Geography, 39(1), 73-81.
  72. Zeng X. (2011). Environmental efficiency and its determinants across Chinese regions. Economic Theory and Business Management, (10), 103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10042857.2017.1327687
  73. Zhang, J., & Liang, X. J. (2012). Promoting green ICT in China: A framework based on innovation system approaches. Telecommunications Policy, 36(10-11), 997-1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.09.001
  74. Zhang, Y., Zhang, S. & Wang, R. (2020). The Logic and Social Welfare Effects of China's Pension Reform: An Analysis from the Perspective of Population Quantity-Quality Transformation. Economic Research Journal, (08),188-205.
  75. Zhao, T., Zhang, Z., & Liang, S. (2020). Digital Economy, Entrepreneurship, and High-Quality Economic Development: Empirical Evidence from Urban China. Management World, (10), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.3868/s060-015-022-0015-6