Open Access Journal Article

Government Behavior and Innovation: The Role of Financial Target Setting on Corporate Green Innovation

by Huixin Ling a ,  Jiayi Liu b  and  Jianmin Liu c,*
a
School of Economics and Trade, Hunan University, Changsha, China
b
School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
c
School of Economics and Management, Changsha University, Changsha, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
JIE  2024 2(4):37; https://doi.org/10.58567/jie02040001
Received: 4 November 2024 / Accepted: 31 December 2024 / Published Online: 8 January 2025
View Full-Text
Download PDF

Abstract

As governments worldwide grapple with the urgent need to mitigate climate change, understanding the nuanced relationship between fiscal targets and environmental innovation is crucial for crafting effective policy frameworks. Green technological advancement stands as the cornerstone of enterprise competitiveness, driving improvements in both economic prosperity and environmental sustainability. Government fiscal policies play a pivotal role in shaping the landscape of green transformation within enterprises, particularly through the establishment of fiscal revenue targets. Drawing upon data from prefecture-level cities and enterprise records, this study employs empirical analysis utilizing a fixed effects model and instrumental variable method. Our findings underscore the significant impact of fiscal revenue target setting on the trajectory of green technological advancement within enterprises. Specifically, the imposition of fiscal revenue growth targets exerts a dampening effect on the propensity for green technological advancement among enterprises. Notably, this disincentive is particularly pronounced among state-owned enterprises, as well as those with lower and moderate returns on capital, and those characterized by labor-intensive operations. Furthermore, our research delves into the underlying mechanisms of this inhibitory effect. We ascertain that the pressure associated with fiscal revenue growth targets hampers corporate green technological advancement by amplifying tax burdens and exacerbating financing constraints. In light of these findings, our study not only contributes to the theoretical understanding of the interplay between government fiscal policies and corporate innovation but also provides empirical evidence to inform strategies aimed at reconciling the imperative of fiscal revenue growth with the imperative of fostering green technological advancement within enterprises. In the broader context of governmental efforts to address climate change, this research underscores the importance of aligning fiscal policies with environmental objectives.

Keywords: Government Act; Climate Change; Green Technology Progress; Financial Target Setting;
Copyright: © 2025 by Ling, Liu and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Ling, H.; Liu, J.; Liu, J. Government Behavior and Innovation: The Role of Financial Target Setting on Corporate Green Innovation. Journal of Information Economics, 2024, 2, 37. https://doi.org/10.58567/jie02040001
AMA Style
Ling H, Liu J, Liu J. Government Behavior and Innovation: The Role of Financial Target Setting on Corporate Green Innovation. Journal of Information Economics; 2024, 2(4):37. https://doi.org/10.58567/jie02040001
Chicago/Turabian Style
Ling, Huixin; Liu, Jiayi; Liu, Jianmin 2024. "Government Behavior and Innovation: The Role of Financial Target Setting on Corporate Green Innovation" Journal of Information Economics 2, no.4:37. https://doi.org/10.58567/jie02040001
APA style
Ling, H., Liu, J., & Liu, J. (2024). Government Behavior and Innovation: The Role of Financial Target Setting on Corporate Green Innovation. Journal of Information Economics, 2(4), 37. https://doi.org/10.58567/jie02040001

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Abuselidze, G. (2012). The influence of optimal tax burden on economic activity and production capacity. Intelektinė Ekonomika, 6(4), 493-503.
  2. Block, J. H., Colombo, M. G., Cumming, D. J., and Vismara, S. (2018). New players in entrepreneurial finance and why they are there. Small Business Economics, 50, 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9826-6
  3. Chen, H., Tang, S., Wu, D., and Yang, D. (2021). The political dynamics of corporate tax avoidance: The Chinese experience. The Accounting Review, 96(5), 157-180. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2017-0601
  4. Chen, L., Huang, L., Hua, J., Chen, Z., Wei, L., Osman, A. I., ... and Yap, P. S. (2023). Green construction for low-carbon cities: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01544-4
  5. Chen, S., Sun, Z., Tang, S., and Wu, D. (2011). Government intervention and investment efficiency: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(2), 259-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.08.004
  6. Chen, X., Chen, G., Lin, M., Tang, K., and Ye, B. (2022). How does anti-corruption affect enterprise green innovation in China’s energy-intensive industries?. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 44(9), 2919-2942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-021-01125-4
  7. Dang, D., Fang, H., and He, M. (2019). Economic policy uncertainty, tax quotas and corporate tax burden: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 56, 101303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101303
  8. Doran, J., and Ryan, G. (2012). Regulation and firm perception, eco-innovation and firm performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(4), 421-441. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061211272367
  9. Du, F., Tang, G., and Young, S. M. (2012). Influence activities and favoritism in subjective performance evaluation: Evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises. The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1555-1588. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50196
  10. Du, J., and Yi, H. (2022). Target‐setting, political incentives, and the tricky trade‐off between economic development and environmental protection. Public Administration, 100(4), 923-941. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12768
  11. Du, L., Lin, W., Du, J., Jin, M., and Fan, M. (2022). Can vertical environmental regulation induce enterprise green innovation? A new perspective from automatic air quality monitoring station in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 317, 115349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115349
  12. Ellström, D., and Carlborg, P. (2022). Manufacturer go green: A typology of offerings and capability requirements. Industrial Marketing Management, 107, 423-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.10.009
  13. Elschner, C., Lammersen, L., Overesch, M., and Schwager, R. (2006). The effective tax burden of companies and of highly skilled manpower: Tax policy strategies in a globalised economy. Fiscal Studies, 27(4), 513-534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2006.00044.x
  14. García-Quevedo, J., Segarra-Blasco, A., and Teruel, M. (2018). Financial constraints and the failure of innovation projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.029
  15. Gong, C., Zhang, J., and Liu, H. (2021). Do industrial pollution activities in China respond to ecological fiscal transfers? Evidence from payments to national key ecological function zones. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(7), 1184-1203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1813695
  16. Guo, G. (2007). Retrospective economic accountability under authoritarianism: evidence from China. Political Research Quarterly, 60(3), 378-390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907304501
  17. Hu, G., Wang, X., and Wang, Y. (2021). Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Economics, 98, 105134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105134
  18. Kaplan, A., and Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational psychology review, 19, 141-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5
  19. Karhunen, H., and Huovari, J. (2015). R&D subsidies and productivity in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 45, 805-823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9658-9
  20. Kéïta, K., and Laurila, H. (2021). Corruption and tax burden: what is the joint effect on total factor productivity?. Economies, 9(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9010026
  21. Kim, I., Pantzalis, C., and Zhang, Z. (2021). Multinationality and the value of green innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 69, 101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101996
  22. Lee, C. C., Feng, Y., and Peng, D. (2022). A green path towards sustainable development: The impact of low-carbon city pilot on energy transition. Energy Economics, 115, 106343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106343
  23. Li, D., Gou, C., and Han, M. (2023). Research on the influence mechanism of green finance on the quality of green innovation of private enterprises: evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(11), 30905-30918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23906-9
  24. Li, F., Wang, Z., and Huang, L. (2022). Economic growth target and environmental regulation intensity: Evidence from 284 cities in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16269-0
  25. Li, X., and Li, Z. (2022). Does environmental regulation contribute to enterprise green innovation? Empirical data based on the mediation effect from the perspective of executive compensation. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2116571
  26. Li, X., Liu, C., Weng, X., and Zhou, L. A. (2019). Target setting in tournaments: theory and evidence from China. The Economic Journal, 129(623), 2888-2915. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uez018
  27. Li, X., Liu, C., Weng, X., and Zhou, L. A. (2019). Target setting in tournaments: theory and evidence from China. The Economic Journal, 129(623), 2888-2915. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uez018
  28. Li, X., Shao, X., Chang, T., and Albu, L. L. (2022). Does digital finance promote the green innovation of China's listed companies?. Energy Economics, 114, 106254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106254
  29. Lin, B., and Zhou, Y. (2023). How do economic growth targets affect energy consumption? The role of Chinese-style fiscal decentralization. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 169, 736-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.11.056
  30. Lin, J. Y., Cai, F., and Li, Z. (1998). Competition, policy burdens, and state-owned enterprise reform. The American economic review, 88(2), 422-427.
  31. Liu, D., Xu, C., Yu, Y., Rong, K., and Zhang, J. (2020). Economic growth target, distortion of public expenditure and business cycle in China. China Economic Review, 63, 101373.
  32. Liu, S., Mai, Q., and Chen, X. (2022). The province-managing-county reform and green innovation of enterprises: Evidence from the quasi-natural experiment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(59), 88823-88838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21834-2
  33. Liu, S., Xu, R., and Chen, X. (2021). Does green credit affect the green innovation performance of high-polluting and energy-intensive enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 65265-65277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15217-2
  34. Liu, T., Wang, Y., and Zhou, W. (2023). The impact of stock liquidity on green technology innovation of new energy enterprises: Evidence from China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03218-9
  35. Liu, Y., and Mao, J. (2019). How do tax incentives affect investment and productivity? Firm-level evidence from China. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(3), 261-291. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20170478
  36. Lu, N., and Zhou, W. (2023). The impact of green taxes on green innovation of enterprises: a quasi-natural experiment based on the levy of environmental protection taxes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(40), 92568-92580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28718-z
  37. Luo, Y., Wang, X., and Wang, L. (2023). The Influence of China’s Local Fiscal Revenue Targets on House Price Growth. Housing Policy Debate, 33(3), 699-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2021.2010117
  38. Ma, L. (2016). Performance feedback, government goal‐setting and aspiration level adaptation: Evidence from Chinese provinces. Public Administration, 94(2), 452-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12225
  39. Nuţă, A. C. (2008). The incidence of public spending on economic growth. Euro Economica, 20(01), 65-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2022.2086147
  40. Ren, S., Wang, Y., Hu, Y., and Yan, J. (2021). CEO hometown identity and firm green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 756-774. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2652
  41. Salge, T. O. (2011). A behavioral model of innovative search: Evidence from public hospital services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), 181-210. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq017
  42. Shao, Y., and Chen, Z. (2022). Can government subsidies promote the green technology innovation transformation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Economic Analysis and Policy, 74, 716-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.03.020
  43. Shao, Y., Hernández, R., and Liu, P. (2015). Government intervention and corporate policies: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1205-1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.015
  44. Shen, F., Liu, B., Luo, F., Wu, C., Chen, H., and Wei, W. (2021). The effect of economic growth target constraints on green technology innovation. Journal of Environmental Management, 292, 112765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112765
  45. Shen, F., Liu, B., Luo, F., Wu, C., Chen, H., and Wei, W. (2021). The effect of economic growth target constraints on green technology innovation. Journal of Environmental Management, 292, 112765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112765
  46. Shi, Q., and Lai, X. (2013). Identifying the underpin of green and low carbon technology innovation research: A literature review from 1994 to 2010. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(5), 839-864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.002
  47. Shi, Y., Li, J., and Liu, R. (2023). Financing constraints and share pledges: Evidence from the share pledge reform in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 78, 102337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102337
  48. Song, W., and Yu, H. (2018). Green innovation strategy and green innovation: The roles of green creativity and green organizational identity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1445
  49. Stanko, M. A., and Henard, D. H. (2017). Toward a better understanding of crowdfunding, openness and the consequences for innovation. Research Policy, 46(4), 784-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.003
  50. Su, W., Lei, G., Guo, S., and Dan, H. (2022). Study on the Influence Mechanism of Environmental Management System Certification on Enterprise Green Innovation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912379
  51. Talavera, O., Tsapin, A., and Zholud, O. (2012). Macroeconomic uncertainty and bank lending: The case of Ukraine. Economic systems, 36(2), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2011.06.005
  52. Taliercio Jr, R. R. (2004). Administrative reform as credible commitment: the impact of autonomy on revenue authority performance in Latin America. World Development, 32(2), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.08.008
  53. Tan, Y., and Zhu, Z. (2022). The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and managers' environmental awareness. Technology in Society, 68, 101906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101906
  54. Tang, C., Xu, Y., Hao, Y., Wu, H., and Xue, Y. (2021). What is the role of telecommunications infrastructure construction in green technology innovation? A firm-level analysis for China. Energy Economics, 103, 105576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105576
  55. Tang, K., Qiu, Y., and Zhou, D. (2020). Does command-and-control regulation promote green innovation performance? Evidence from China's industrial enterprises. Science of the Total Environment, 712, 136362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136362
  56. Tang, P., Jiang, Q., and Mi, L. (2021). One-vote veto: the threshold effect of environmental pollution in China's economic promotion tournament. Ecological Economics, 185, 107069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107069
  57. Vorhies, D. W., Morgan, R. E., and Autry, C. W. (2009). Product‐market strategy and the marketing capabilities of the firm: impact on market effectiveness and cash flow performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), 1310-1334. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.798
  58. Wan, B., Tian, L., Zhu, N., Gu, L., and Zhang, G. (2018). A new endogenous growth model for green low-carbon behavior and its comprehensive effects. Applied Energy, 230, 1332-1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.076
  59. Wang, F. F., Deng, W. J., Cheng, H., Gao, Q., Deng, Z. W., and Deng, H. C. (2021). The impact of local economic growth target setting on the quality of public occupational health: evidence from provincial and city government work reports in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 769672. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.769672
  60. Wang, F., Feng, L., Li, J., and Wang, L. (2020). Environmental regulation, tenure length of officials, and green innovation of enterprises. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2284. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072284
  61. Wang, H., Qi, S., Zhou, C., Zhou, J., and Huang, X. (2022). Green credit policy, government behavior and green innovation quality of enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 331, 129834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129834
  62. Wang, J. (2023). The impact of investor communication on enterprise green innovation. Finance Research Letters, 57, 104158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104158
  63. Wang, L., Wang, H., Dong, Z., Wang, S., and Cao, Z. (2021). The air pollution effect of government economic growth expectations: Evidence from China’s cities based on green technology. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 27639-27654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12536-2
  64. Wang, Z., Li, X., Xue, X., and Liu, Y. (2022). More government subsidies, more green innovation? The evidence from Chinese new energy vehicle enterprises. Renewable Energy, 197, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.086
  65. Wei, Z., Yuguo, J., and Jiaping, W. (2015). Greenization of venture capital and green innovation of Chinese entity industry. Ecological Indicators, 51, 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.10.025
  66. Yu, C. H., Wu, X., Zhang, D., Chen, S., and Zhao, J. (2021). Demand for green finance: Resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China. Energy Policy, 153, 112255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112255
  67. Zhang, C., Liu, T., Li, J., Xu, M., Li, X., and Wang, H. (2023). Economic Growth Target, Government Expenditure Behavior, and Cities’ Ecological Efficiency—Evidence from 284 Cities in China. Land, 12(1), 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010182
  68. Zhang, C., Zhou, B., and Tian, X. (2022). Political connections and green innovation: The role of a corporate entrepreneurship strategy in state-owned enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 146, 375-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.084
  69. Zhang, D., and Jin, Y. (2021). RandD and environmentally induced innovation: Does financial constraint play a facilitating role?. International Review of Financial Analysis, 78, 101918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101918
  70. Zhang, P. (2021). Target interactions and target aspiration level adaptation: How do government leaders tackle the “environment‐economy” nexus?. Public Administration Review, 81(2), 220-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13184
  71. Zhao, J., Pongtornkulpanich, A., and Cheng, W. (2022). The impact of board size on green innovation in China’s heavily polluting enterprises: The mediating role of innovation openness. Sustainability, 14(14), 8632. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148632
  72. Zhong, Q., Wen, H., and Lee, C. C. (2022). How does economic growth target affect corporate environmental investment? Evidence from heavy-polluting industries in China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 95, 106799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106799
  73. Zhou, D., Lu, Z., and Qiu, Y. (2023). Do carbon emission trading schemes enhance enterprise green innovation efficiency? Evidence from China's listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137668